Monday 12 September 2016

Big Wins, Huge Losses

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUTOBuo7R60&list=PL_lc3fEAy32GVGS-CFTTL33Zje7CgSC8E&index=11
The Edge Property Singapore

Published on Aug 16, 2016

From January to June 2016, there are 3,103 resale transactions in the non -landed private residential market,

15% were sold at loss.

The majority of the losses occurred in CORE CENTRAL REGION.


The biggest year-to-date loss is at THE RITZ-CARLTON RESIDENCES, where the seller lost $4,268,000


Seller lost $3,364,960 at TURQUOISE (2nd biggest loss).

The biggest year-to-date profit is at project ARDMORE PARK, where the seller made $3,529,832.


Seller made $3,300,000 at ST REGIS RESIDENCES (2nd most profitable).

Project JARDIN (7 unprofitable transactions) had the most number of unprofitable transactions.


Project A TREASURE TROVE (23 profitable transactions) had the most number of profitable deals.


SCOTTS SQUARE saw two of its most unprofitable homes this year, both were sold at a loss of $1.2million. The last million dollar loss seen from the development was in November 2008.

A two-bedroom condo unit at LATITUDE were sold twice, both losses.
  • 1st: Sold in February 2012 at a loss of $389,000 (5.% annualised loss)
  • 2nd: Sold in April 2016 at a loss of $613,000 (2.9% annualised loss)  

Tuesday 5 July 2016

7 years' jail for serial cheat who splurged on BMW

7 years' jail for serial cheat who splurged on BMW
https://shar.es/1l6ugV

Ng Huiwen
The Straits Times
13 February 2016


A serial cheat passed himself off as a lawyer to more than 20 property buyers, cheating and misappropriating nearly $1.8 million, part of which he splurged on a BMW 5 Series car.
His plan was said to be almost like a Ponzi scheme, which involves using fresh funds from new parties to pay those who had joined earlier.
And it lasted 14 months before Sim Tee Peng, 39, was caught.
He was yesterday jailed for seven years and two months for 23 charges, including cheating, criminal misappropriation and acting as an authorised advocate or solicitor. He received an additional 12 weeks' jail for three counts of counterfeiting stamp duty certificates.
From June 2011 to September 2012, Sim collected stamp duty payments and conveyancing-related fees from 21 property buyers, supposedly on behalf of four law firms.
He received between $17,088 and $312,000 from each victim.
Although he previously worked as a paralegal and had about four years of conveyancing experience, Sim was never formally employed by the law firms and did not have a valid practising certificate.
His modus operandi involved instructing the victims to deposit the monies into his or his company's bank account.
He then told them that he had issued his own personal cheques for the payments.
Sim, now a salesman, was then director of general wholesale company WW Hub.
To dupe victims into thinking the fees were paid, he produced fake documents, such as false invoices using a law firm's letterhead.
Sim even passed himself off once as a partner of a law firm, on name cards given to property buyers.
Describing his tactics as almost like a Ponzi scheme, District Judge Low Wee Ping noted that Sim used the monies he earned from later victims to pay off earlier victims.
In all, Sim misappropriated millions of dollars, although the judge also noted that the actual loss suffered was about $200,000.
On instances when the victims directly deposited the fees into the law firm's account, Sim would counterfeit stamp certificates to dupe the firm into giving him reimbursements for stamp duties he had supposedly paid using his own funds.
His offences came to light in January 2012 after the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore looked into forged stamp certificates for property transactions handled by him.
While out on bail pending police investigations, Sim continued to offend several times, including driving his ill-gotten BMW car with a false vehicle licence number.
His plan involved "much premeditation, planning and calculation", said the judge.
For cheating, Sim could have been jailed up to 10 years and fined.

Alleged mastermind behind '$60m ponzi scam' cuts off all contact with investors, says she's taking her own life

Alleged mastermind behind '$60m ponzi scam' cuts off all contact with investors, says she's taking her own life
https://shar.es/1l67Iq

Joanna Seow
The Straits Times
May 24, 2015


It started out as a sweet deal involving the buying and selling of properties in Singapore's choicest districts, promising around 30 per cent returns.
Now, around 60 investors have come forward to claim they have been duped in what could be a multi-million-dollar ponzi scam.
The investors said the alleged mastermind behind the elaborate scheme, Ms Leong Lai Yee, owes investors more than $60 million in capital alone.
They also told The Sunday Times that the woman, who is in her 50s, cut off contact with them last weekend, but not before telling them that their money was gone and she wanted to take her own life.
At least 10 investors have lodged police reports.
The police said in response to queries:
"It is inappropriate to comment on investigations."
The scheme may have started unravelling only last year, but it has been going on some 15 years.
Through the period, Ms Leong allegedly hooked more than 100 investors with her promise of a virtually no-risk programme.
On the "advice" of a banker, she would buy distressed properties in Orchard, Tanglin and Newton, which are on the verge of being repossessed by banks, and sell them to buyers in China for a profit.
Investors who pumped in money to fund the purchase of these distressed properties were promised returns ranging from 10 per cent to 48 per cent over a period of four to eight months, they said.
They were also told that the eventual buyers would place a 40 per cent downpayment on the property, which would be forfeited if these buyers backed out.
This would be enough to pay the profits promised to investors.
The Sunday Times was shown business agreements between investors and Ms Leong guaranteeing their capital and pro-rated profit.
The money which investors pumped in ranged from $10,000 to more than $2 million.
Those who referred friends were also given a cut, which could be anywhere from 1 per cent to as much as half of the new funds.
One investor, who gave her name only as Madam J.
Tan, said Ms Leong claimed to be marketing high-end condominiums in Singapore's Districts 9, 10 and 11, although there were never any documents to prove this.
"We just trusted her because of the testimonies of those who knew her for a long time," said the 50-year-old, who put in $1 million and introduced several friends to the programme.
Among the investors were retirees and housewives like Madam Tan.
She said Ms Leong had urged people to withdraw their Central Provident Fund savings, borrow from their insurance policies or take a second mortgage on their properties to free up cash to invest.
Several investors were with the scheme for over 10 years, while the latest joined just last month.
Ms Leong, who was known to friends as Adeline, built up trust and goodwill over the years, even inviting investors over for Chinese New Year parties at her well-decorated semi-detached house in Tanah Merah.
"She is someone who sits down together with you, laughs, goes for dinner, holidays in Thailand and Hong Kong together with you. Will you suspect anything?" said a 58-year-old businessman who gave his name only as Mr S. Goh.
He had gotten to know Ms Leong in 2001, and together with friends and relatives poured more than $2 million into the scheme.
He also put returns and referral fees back in as investments.
"There were never any problems. There were even people who pulled out early and got their capital and pro-rated returns back," he said, explaining why no alarm bells went off for so many years.
It appeared to be only in the past few years that things started going wrong and Ms Leong tried to raise more funds by offering higher returns of 35 per cent for a six-month contract.
This bears the hallmark of a ponzi scheme, in which fresh funds from new investors are used to pay those who joined earlier.
Last September, several investors received a text message from Ms Leong saying she would pay them only in December, but with additional interest.
A week later, she postponed payment to March 9. She told investors then she was trying to negotiate a $70 million deal that would allow her to repay everyone.
When March 9 came, payments were pushed to May 18.
Four days before the deadline, investors were asked for their addresses so they could be sent invoices.
But instead of invoices, some of them later received a letter from Ms Leong in which she said she would kill herself.
She and her husband have been uncontactable since, investors said.
Attempts by The Sunday Times to call her were unsuccessful.
Ms Chan Shwe Ching, an investor, began legal proceedings against Ms Leong last month.
Her lawyer Michael Chia said the courts have allowed an injunction to freeze Ms Leong's assets within Singapore. Ms Alina Sim, who is still Ms Leong's lawyer on record, said she was not at liberty to discuss the case.
Around 30 people have also hired a lawyer to launch a civil suit against Ms Leong, said an investor who gave his name as Mr Ong.
Mr Goh said he had dinner with Ms Leong just last month.
Now, he and the other investors are hoping her family and the public will help to locate her.
"This is not a Korean drama, it is real," he said ruefully. "There are real people, real families involved."

Singaporeans lose thousands after US property scheme turns sour

Singaporeans lose thousands after US property scheme turns sour
https://shar.es/1l6vCZ
Posted on 3 February 2015

Judith Tan
The New Paper
Feb 01, 2015
 
Almost all his savings were wiped out. This included money for his family, two schoolgoing children and holiday plans.
 
Mr Kenneth Ng, 43, never imagined himself to be a real estate investor, but after listening to a speaker at a property seminar, he invested almost all of his $80,000 savings.
 
The supply chain executive, who earns $8,000 a month, bought a "fixer-upper" in the US city of Memphis for US$55,000 (S$74,500).

A fixer-upper is real estate slang for a property that needs maintenance work, such as redecoration, reconstruction or redesign, before it can be lived in. That was in 2013. Mr Ng never got the promised returns.
 
The property guru who made the sales pitch? She stopped taking calls and answering e-mails. Then out of the blue, Mr Ng received letters from lawyers in the US telling him to pay up or the property would face foreclosure.
 
Mr Ng, who has never been to the US, sent two cheques of US$4,000 and US$5,000 to keep the bank at bay. He is not the only one to put their trust in the US property scheme - others had invested in houses in Indianapolis.
 
One investor bought two properties - the first in Memphis, the other in Indianapolis - through the same scheme. She even made a video 10 months ago, praising the scheme and the woman behind it.
 
Now, the same investor is singing a different tune, saying that her cheques to the banks to stop the foreclosure of her homes are currently stuck at a US lawyer's office.

And the promised returns? She said she only received one month's worth of rent from the Memphis property. The investor, who spoke to The New Paper on Sunday, declined to be identified and is holding out for money to be returned.
 
A group of these investors contacted TNPS to tell their story. Some are civil servants. A couple are in between jobs, but most have regular jobs.

All of them have put their trust in a woman who allegedly told them she would handle everything, from the loans to legal letters.
 
There was nothing for the investors to do other than to wait for their money to grow at returns of between 14.5 and 22.3 per cent.
 
They were told they would own the properties, which would be repaired before being rented out within three to six months. And when values go up, they would be flipped. It was just too easy.
 
Mr Ng said: "I'm not familiar with the US property market - none of the investors are. But the presentation by CTL Property was good and its founder Clara Tan was very convincing,"
 
He met her at real estate seminars held at Marina Bay Sands, first in December 2012 and again in February 2013.
 
"What drew many of us in was, CTL is a one-stop shop, offering full services from tax submissions, tax filing, getting legal representations and so forth," he said.
 
He said like him, the other investors even signed over their power of attorney - that meant legally, she could decide for them.
 
"I'm not a detailed person, so when CTL said it will hold all the documents, I didn't demand a copy of the contracts for myself," Mr Ng said.
 
That was the start of a massive headache. CTL Group and its founder and director, Ms Clara Tan, were hot in the property scene between 2008 and 2012.
 
Her seminars on topics such as maximising rental yield, spotting prime property below market value, need-to-know tips for foreign markets and the power of leverage saw robust turnouts, and were sometimes over-subscribed.
 
Believing in her business model, several Singaporeans invested their hard-earned savings in her projects in Memphis and Indianapolis, where she said she "flipped" properties.
 
When the US housing bubble burst and the 2008 banking crisis followed, owners in many US cities, including Memphis and Indianapolis, were badly hit.
 
Many simply abandoned the properties they could no longer make payments for. The Singaporean investors bought over these houses.

Their money was supposed to be used to repair dozens of homes in some of the most down-and-out neighbourhoods of the two cities. The investors paid in full and the cost was supposed to cover all renovations. There were not supposed to be bank loans.
 
They also owned the US properties but to minimise work on their part, they signed the power of attorney over to Ms Tan's company for CTL to manage the properties.
 
But only one of the 12 investors TNPS met received a title deed. The rest never got their documents because they were told the documents would all be posted online on the company's website. It never happened.
 
In Indianapolis, Ms Tan's company popped up in county land sales records of 2013 as the buyer of at least 18 low-priced homes in Center Township. These purchases stood out, because at least eight were sold by non-profit group New Day Residential.
 
In May 2013, the president of New Day Residential was among five people charged in a kickback and bribery scandal involving vacant homes sold by the city-run Indy Land Bank.
 
One John Hawkins pleaded guilty to wire fraud in an alleged scheme to reap kickbacks from the sale of abandoned properties last June.
 
On Sept 2013, The Indianapolis Star reported that CTL Global Holdings had already resold some of its Indianapolis properties "at prices sharply higher than it paid for them to buyers with Asian names".
 
For instance, records in 2013 showed two side-by-side houses bought by CTL were sold by the Land Bank to New Day for US$2,500 (S$3,390) in March.
 
They were resold that same month to CTL for US$10,000 and in April, CTL "flipped" the houses for US$38,334 each to the current owners. Both homes remain unrenovated.
 
"The first sign of trouble was six months after, when the property management company engaged by CTL started communicating directly with us, the investors," said Mr Kenneth Ng. The property management company in question is in the US.
 
Mr Ng's troubles were echoed by many other investors and The New Paper on Sunday met with seven of them on Jan 24. A 60-year-old investor told TNPS on Friday that he bought two properties in Indianapolis and paid in full, spending about $100,000 in all.
 
"I was given the two title deeds but in the US, the homes were not really under my name - it was under CTL Global Holdings LLC," he said.

The purchases were finalised in July 2013 and he was receiving rental payment from one of the properties until September last year.
 
The investors were supposed to receive rental income, ranging from US$400 to US$600 (S$540 to S$810), three to six months after they became owners of the houses. The delay was to ensure renovations to the houses were completed and tenants secured.
 
But after six months, the seven investors claimed they had received no returns from the rentals. Instead, US banks sent them letters for mortgages unpaid and warned of foreclosing the properties.
 
"The last we heard was that 12 properties owned by Singaporeans have been foreclosed and six are waiting for foreclosure," said another investor, a civil servant who wanted to be known only as Ms Tan.
 
"With 12 properties foreclosed and each costing about US$50,000, our losses amount to US$600,000," she added. At first, the investors claimed, Ms Clara Tan called them regularly to update them.
 
But around mid-2014, the calls slowed down and eventually died. The investors grew worried when US banks wrote to them, telling them to make good the mortgage payment or their properties might face foreclosure.
 
The investors then wrote to Ms Tan repeatedly. They also called and even visited her Pemimpin Drive office and home address, a condominium at Upper Thomson Road. She could not be reached.
 
One investor, however, managed to get her on Skype sometime in November and she claimed she was being detained in Indianapolis by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and her passport had been impounded.
 
Some investors decided to group together to find some way to get themselves out of trouble. They made separate police reports on Jan 17 and 18,and reported to the Council for Estate Agencies on Jan 29.

Police confirmed the reports had been lodged and would only say that they were looking into the matter. TNPS also contacted FBI Special Agent and Media Representative (Indianapolis) Wendy Osborne.
 
Are they looking into land purchases by CTL Global and is it linked to a land bank scandal? Is the FBI or another law-enforcement agency holding Ms Tan? Ms Osborne would only say that the FBI does not confirm or deny investigations.
 
Often, when a Singaporean is in trouble overseas, a relative might contact the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for assistance. But an MFA spokesman says the ministry has not been approached for assistance.
 
The New Paper on Sunday team visited the CTL Global office at One Pemimpin twice, and the door was locked on both occasions. Calls to the numbers listed on the website also went unanswered.
 
A check with neighbouring offices found that no one had been seen going in or coming out of the unit since three months ago. Twice, the team visited her condominium, but nobody answered the door even though Chinese New Year decorations were up.
 
An e-mail sent to Ms Tan also went unanswered. But TNPS understands that Tan and CTL Global are not only foraying into Cambodia, but have also conducted webinars (seminars via the Web) since Jan 8 to attract investors from the country.
 
 


Sunday 3 April 2016

Investors left in the lurch as diamond firm Asia Fine Diamonds folds up

Investors left in the lurch as diamond firm Asia Fine Diamonds folds up http://str.sg/ZvLR

Source: The Straits Times
4 April 2016

Along with other customers of Asia Fine Diamonds (AFD), Mr Stephen Yeo learnt the hard way that diamonds are not his best friend after his investment in rare coloured diamonds went awry.

Last December, Mr Yeo, 55, who works in the medical sector, invested $17,785.12 in a 0.21-carat round cut diamond - described as "fancy intense purplish pink" - from AFD. He never laid hands on it.

This is the latest firm to come under scrutiny after recent reports by The Straits Times on two other firms - One Plantation Capital and Tropical Forestry Venture - which offered attractive returns in their agarwood investment schemes to retail investors.

Last month, Mr Yeo filed a police report against AFD, which used to have an office in Maybank Tower in Battery Road.

Not only are AFD customers crying foul, according to company staff, but employees are also up in arms as they have not been paid their wages and commissions for a few months. According to an AFD employee who spoke to The Straits Times on condition of anonymity, about 20 AFD staff involved in sales, telemarketing and administrative functions have not been paid for about two months. The office closed down in January.

Under AFD's two-year scheme, customers are offered a choice of coloured diamonds from a brochure. After selecting a diamond of their choice, they pay the cost of the diamond upfront. The average cost per diamond was about $15,000.

Customers sign an acquisition form which acts as a request for AFD to buy the diamonds on their behalf. They also sign a "storage and buy-back contract" with AFD. In the contract, customers are described as "the storer", while AFD is "the storage provider".

They were told to expect delivery of their diamonds one month later. However, they were advised that to avoid paying GST for their diamonds, AFD would store them in Christie's Fine Art Storage Services at Changi Airport. They would be given access to the warehouse for the purpose of viewing their diamonds.

There would be a 15 per cent annual return on the investment sum for two years, payable at the end of each year. This works out to a total return of 30 per cent - about $5,300 in the case of Mr Yeo's investment.

At the end of two years, the customers can opt to exercise the option for AFD to buy back the diamonds and return them their initial investment sums. If they wish to keep the diamond, they will forgo the 30 per cent returns.

Mr Yeo said he knew something had gone wrong only when he was not contacted by AFD to say that his diamond had been delivered to the Changi warehouse more than a month after he had paid and signed the documents. He was later informed by an AFD employee that the firm was in financial difficulties and that the chief executive and owner had gone missing.

"I was greedy and tempted by the high returns of 30 per cent. I was very angry initially because I should have done due diligence. But the AFD office looked very nice and it is registered here. I took a gamble and decided to see what comes out of it," said Mr Yeo.

He recalled that AFD's 4,000 sq ft office was luxuriously decorated and there was a showcase of diamonds in one of the rooms. He was also trying to help a friend who had sold him a property in the Philippines in her previous employment before moving to AFD as a sales consultant.

AFD was set up last June and has a paid-up capital of $10,000, Acra records show. It stated that the firm's director, Mr Guillianno Norberto R. Mata Pena, is from the Dominican Republic.

Mr David Gerald, president and chief executive of Securities Investor Association of Singapore, cautioned retail investors to look out for telltale signs when something looks too good to be true.

"There have been a number of scams reported and yet some people are falling for scams over and over again. People must get smart and ask basic questions before parting with hard-earned money," he said.

"Telltale signs include high returns which are more than what banks and good growth companies can offer. They must ring bells in our minds. How can others offer such high returns? Don't get carried away by high returns or a good sales pitch. Ask for advice and don't deal with unregulated entities."

Monday 14 March 2016

Spot the scam

Spot the scam http://str.sg/Zyfm

Source: Straits Times

PUBLISHED